By clicking through to the Investments or Platforms site below you confirm that you are a licensed adviser operating under an Australian Financial Services License.

Growth or Value?

In a world of disruption, it’s the winners that matter.

At Baillie Gifford we’ve spent many years resisting the simplistic either/or notion of growth vs value investment styles. We state our own style clearly as growth, but what we mean by that is far more important than a simple label.

At Baillie Gifford we’ve spent many years resisting the simplistic either/or notion of growth vs value investment styles. We state our own style clearly as growth, but what we mean by that is far more important than a simple label. 

‘Growth’ to us means looking ahead 5 years and longer, seeking out companies that we believe can at least double earnings in this time frame, and that will still be growing rapidly when they get there. Ideally, we look for at least the possibility of much more.


‘Value’ on the other hand traditionally means investing in companies that are trading at a discount to some notional intrinsic value – buying them cheaply when investors have over-reacted to short-term news, and waiting for a reversion to historic mean. But this is equally a rather clumsy definition, and value investing can surely evolve its own definitions.


We’ve been writing for some time now about why the margin-of-safety, mean-reversion world that favoured value investors of old may not be a useful model anymore. We invest in a world where companies can grow at unprecedented rates and at little marginal cost, where intangible assets such as intellectual property, networks and data are the main determinants of future cashflows. Such assets create increasing returns to scale and winner-takes-all dynamics, often making mean reversion amongst the disrupted a forlorn hope. Value investing has often been promoted by emphasising downside protection for investors in a falling market, thanks to some notional floor on valuations (say book value). But this may not hold any more – let’s be tentative about concluding anything, but recent history suggests the security of growing and robust cashflows has outweighed the attractions of tangible assets. Why would oil company shares mean revert if renewable energy is becoming both cheaper and storable (and we’re finally pricing in the astronomical environmental cost of burning carbon)? Why would physical retailers mean revert when physically going to a shop isn’t necessary anymore? This is Schumpeterian Destruction on steroids.


History shows that the vast majority of long-term wealth creation in stock markets comes from a vanishingly small number of explosive winners. So, ‘Growth or Value?’ isn’t really the right question anymore (if indeed it ever was). Both growth and value fail as investment strategies - in index terms - when compared to the much narrower quest for exponentiality. The real question ought to be ‘how do we find the c5% that matter?’


Some relevant statistics


In US$ terms, over 10 years to March 2020, the MSCI AC World Growth index returned 127.7%. The equivalent value index returned 51.4%. Growth outperformed by 76%. But on its own this doesn’t tell us much unless all growth stocks performed alike and all value stocks performed alike – we need to dig deeper. The top 20 contributors (or c1.4% of names) in the growth index contributed more than half of its outperformance vs value. The top 170 stocks – that’s c12% - accounted for all of the outperformance vs value, and almost 2/3rds of the total return. Meanwhile, a balance of roughly 300 companies moved from Growth to Value, suggesting sustained growth is increasingly hard to find and not many value companies are becoming growth companies.


Turning to the very recent past, what have we learned from Covid-19? Of course, let’s acknowledge and take a moment to register the human cost. But financially? Well short-term individual share price returns are noise. But taking the markets as a whole, maybe we have learned something - the dawning realisation that we have whole other ways of going about our daily lives. Yet more economic and social activity has moved online. Massive online networks of people can be used for the common good. Many of us don’t actually need to leave home to go to work. We can at least hope to find medical solutions to totally new problems on a fraction of previous timescales. In short, habits have been broken and we adapt rapidly to our new norms. What investors may have realised is that a huge chunk of the index is heading for obsolescence, and a huge chunk of the new norm correlates to a tiny number of companies. Now is not the time to rebalance in the name of mean reversion, and the index is a dangerous place.


About Baillie Gifford

Baillie Gifford is an independent investment manager that’s expressly focussed on the long-term, with an investment philosophy in equites that’s motivated to seek growth opportunities within a global universe. Baillie Gifford’s belief is that sustained growth in company profits leads to higher share prices over time. Baillie Gifford’s rigorous process of fundamental analysis and proprietary research, combined with a depth of expertise, are core to a successful, long-term, bottom-up investment approach.

Adviser use only

Unless otherwise specified, this document has been prepared by Colonial First State Investments Limited ABN 98 002 348 352, AFS Licence 232468 (Colonial First State) based on its understanding of current regulatory requirements and laws as at the date of publication. While all care has been taken in the preparation of this document (using sources believed to be reliable and accurate), to the maximum extent permitted by law, no person including Colonial First State or any member of the Commonwealth Bank group of companies, accepts responsibility for any loss suffered by any person arising from reliance on this information. Colonial First State is the issuer of interests in FirstChoice Personal Super, FirstChoice Wholesale Personal Super, FirstChoice Pension, FirstChoice Wholesale Pension, FirstChoice Employer Super offered from the Colonial First State FirstChoice Superannuation Trust ABN 26 458 298 557. It also issues interests in the Rollover & Superannuation Fund (ROSCO) and Personal Pension Plan (PPP) offered from the Colonial First State Rollover & Superannuation Fund ABN 88 854 638 840. Colonial First State also issues other investment products made available under FirstChoice Investments and FirstChoice Wholesale Investments, other than FirstRate Saver, FirstRate Term Deposits and FirstRate Investment Deposits which are products of the Commonwealth Bank of Australia ABN 48 123 123 124, AFS Licence 234945 (the Bank). Colonial First State is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Bank. The Bank and its subsidiaries do not guarantee the performance of FirstChoice products or the repayment of capital from any investments. This document provides information for the adviser only and is not to be handed on to any investor. It does not take into account any person’s individual objectives, financial situation or needs. You should read the relevant Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) before making any recommendations to a client. Clients should read the PDS before making an investment decision and consider talking to a financial adviser. PDSs can be obtained from or by calling us on 13 18 36.


From time to time, Colonial First State enters into alliance partnerships with dedicated and experienced investment specialists. Each alliance represents an agreement for Colonial First State to provide third party distribution services within the Australian Financial Services intermediary market.


Past performance is no indication of future performance.


Stocks and investment options mentioned are for illustrative purposes only and are not recommendations to any person to buy sell or hold these stocks.


Taxation considerations are general and based on present taxation laws and may be subject to change. Clients should seek independent, professional tax advice before making any decision based on this information. Colonial First State is also not a registered tax (financial) adviser under the Tax Agent Services Act 2009 and clients should seek tax advice from a registered tax agent or a registered tax (financial) adviser if they intend to rely on this information to satisfy the liabilities or obligations or claim entitlements that arise, or could arise, under a taxation law.

Contact us